Skip to Main Content

UBC-O 11th Annual Learning Conference

Librarian

Profile Photo
Elizabeth Rennie
she/her/hers
Contact:
House of Learning 448
250-371-5775

Live Help

Chat loading...

Presenters

Ginny Ratsoy - English and Modern Languages and Provost’s Fellow of Teaching and Learning Support - Centre for Student Engagement and Learning Innovation
Debbie Andrews - TRU Student and TRU Library staff

Presentation Abstract

The presentation highlights specific examples of the transformative power of experiential learning specific to the SoTL context.  Very often, the role of students in SoTL activity is limited to being subjects in their professors’ classroom inquiries. While completing surveys and participating in interviews and focus groups can be useful experiences for students, they can have a variety of deeper, more active roles in SoTL. At the same time as various sectors of Canadian universities advocate an array of out-of-the-classroom experiences for students – from research assistantships through cooperative education and service learning placements – Scholarship of Teaching and Learning practitioners are attempting to shift their activities to a more central position in campus culture. Drawing on the research of George Kuh on beyond-the-classroom high impact practices, as well that of contributors to Werder, C. & Otis’s (2010) Engaging student voices in the study of teaching and learning, we will argue for the efficacy involvement of undergraduate students in the SoTL work of faculty as a means to both meet the experiential needs of students and raise the visibility of teaching and learning centres. We propose to present several Thompson Rivers case studies, involving our teaching and learning centre and Communities of Practice, as exemplars of successful intersections of SoTL and experiential learning. Importantly, the students who have been involved in these case studies have done so in various capacities, including academic service learning, workstudy, and cooperative education. The interactive component will be a discussion that draws on the experiences of the attendees with SoTL –experiential learning models.

References

Bryman, A., Bell, E. & Teevan, J. T. (2012). Social Research Methods, 3rd Canadian Edition. Don Mills, ON: Oxford University Press.

Garde-Hansen, J. & Calvert, B. (2007). “Developing a Research Culture in the Undergraduate Curriculum.” Active Learning in Higher Education 8 (2): 105-116. doi: 10.1177/1469787407077984.

Haave, N., & Audet, D. (2013). "Evidence in Support of Removing Boundaries to Undergraduate Research Experience." Collected Essays on Learning and Teaching 6: 105-110. Retrieved from http://celt.uwindsor.ca/ojs/leddy/index.php/CELT/article/view/3737

Hutchings, P. (2003). Competing goods: Ethical Issues in the scholarship of teaching and learning. Change (September/October): 27-33. doi: 10.1080/00091380309604116

Hutchings, P. & Taylor Huber, M. (2010). Foreword. In Werder, C. & Otis, M.M. eds. Engaging student voices in the study of teaching and learning. Sterling, VA: Stylus. xi-xv.

Hutchings, P. (2010). The scholarship of teaching and learning: From idea to integration. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, (123) 63-72. doi: 10.1002/tl.410

Katkin, W. (2003).  “The Boyer Commission Report and Its Impact on Undergraduate Research.” New Directions for Teaching and Learning 93: 19-38. Retrieved from http://ca.wiley.com/WileyCDA/WileyTitle/productCd-TL.html

Mabrouk, P. A. (2009). “Survey Study Investigating the Significance of Conference Participation to Undergraduate Research Students.” Journal of Chemical Education 86(11): 1335-1340. doi: 10.1021/ed086p1335

Manor, C., Bloch-Schulman, S., Flannery, K., & Felten, P. (2010). Foundations of student-faculty partnerships in the scholarship of teaching and learning. In Werder, C. & Otis, M.M. eds. Engaging student voices in the study of teaching and learning. Sterling, VA: Stylus. 3-15.

McKinney, K., Jarvis, P., Creasey, G., & Herrmann, D. (2010). A range of student voices in the scholarship of teaching and learning. In Werder, C. And Otis, M.M. eds. Engaging student voices in the study of teaching and learning. Sterling, VA: Stylus. 81-95.

McPeake, J., Bateson, M., & O’Neill, A. (2014). “Electronic Surveys: How to Maximize Success.” Nurse Researcher 21 (3): 24-26. doi: 10.7748/nr2014.01.21.3.24.e1205

Mihans, R.J., Long, D.T., & Felton, P. (2008). Power and expertise: Student-faculty collaboration in course design and the scholarship of teaching and learning. International Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning 2(2:16): 1-9. Retrieved from: http://digitalcommons.georgiasouthern.edu/ij-sotl/vol2/iss2/16

Myers, C.B. (2008). College faculty and the scholarship of teaching: Gender differences across four key activities. Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning 8(2): 38-51. Retrieved from: http://josotl.indiana.edu/article/view/1700

Strum Kenney, S. et al. (1998). Reinventing Undergraduate Education: A Blueprint for America’s Research Universities. Boyer Commission on Educating Undergraduates in the Research University. Shirley Strum Kenny, Chair. New York: State University of New York – Stony Brook, 1998. Retrieved from http://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED424840

Werder, C. & Otis, M.M. (2010) eds. Engaging student voices in the study of teaching and learning. Sterling, VA: Stylus.